Thursday, September 13, 2012
A movie is not causing the violence in the Middle East the violent perpetrators are! I am not supporting that movie, I am only saying reacting in violence was a choice they made. http://www.caintv.com/StopblamingTheMovieandstopassa-411
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
With all of this controversy in the media over Dan Cathy's remarks, I can't help but ask where is the Liberal outrage against Islamic Shari'ah law? According to Islamic Shari'ah law homosexuality is not only punishable by death but it should be the most painful death they can find. Anybody that knows anything about the Oil markets knows that Islamic controlled OPEC has a lot of power there. I do not see a large scale boycott of oil, why is that? I believe it is because this is not truly about what Dan Cathy believes but is the left attacking Christianity and the rights of Christians to hold to and share their beliefs. As we all know Islam is not likely to have a great effect on American politics yet whereas Christianity can unless it has it's legs pulled out from under it. I believe people like Rahm Emanuel are trying to use this as a political maneuver to limit the influence of Christian morals on the election. Well that is just my opinion, if you don't like it sue me, just don't steal my Chick-fil-A sandwich cause I am hungry.
Sunday, July 29, 2012
I will not stand idly by while this once great nation is overrun with political correctness and liberal "tolerances"! I say STAND UP AND BE COUNTED! According to the Dept of Homeland Security I am a terrorist because I oppose abortion and Illegal immigration. According to the Liberal Mayors of several cities ie:Boston, I have no right to my Christian morals and if I stand by them and have a business they will shut me out . According to President Obama I must comply with his idea of proper healthcare . I say we MUST band together and fight for the America we love and we want back! VIVA LA REVOLUTION!!
Thursday, June 28, 2012
"Taxation Without Representation Is Tyranny" This is true, but have you ever stopped to think that so is the opposite? Representation Without Taxation Is Tyranny as well! Why should people who are not taxpayers be allowed to vote money away from those who are? If we must have state services, it should at least be for those who pay for them to vote for which services they want and how much they wish to pay. To allow those providing, or living off, the services to vote is like allowing a shopkeeper to vote on what you must buy from him, or a beggar to vote on what you must give him. Naturally, I hear you say, but doesn’t everyone pay tax, at least on goods and services? And so is the proposition not true but irrelevant? No, they do not and it is not. Not by a very long chalk. PEOPLE IN THE PAY OF THE STATE ARE NOT GENUINE TAXPAYERS. Consider state distribution of tax-money. We can see that this must create two social categories: those who are net taxpayers and those who are net tax recipients. Only the net taxpayers can be said to provide the state with tax-funds. The net tax recipients are paid out of taxation, plus any payments in newly created state-currency (which effectively taxes those who hold money). So to the extent that people are in the pay of the state they cannot be genuine taxpayers. A proof of this is that if their jobs were abolished the state would have more money to spend elsewhere, unlike those jobs in the genuinely taxpaying sector.